This blog series provides a weekly summary highlighting some of the key takeaways as the programmatic industry adopts ads.txt, the IAB-led anti-ad fraud initiative. Last week's update can be found here.
Pixalate has also made available for download the full list of publishers with ads.txt implemented, which also gets updated weekly.
Ads.txt adoption reached some new highs this week:
Here are the latest ads.txt adoption figures, as of March 5, 2018.
As of March 5, 2018, 169,923 publishers have implemented ads.txt.
This represents an increase of 15,522 since last week.
According to Pixalate’s research, the total number of publishers with ads.txt was 89,638 as of January 1, 2018.
An additional 80,000-plus publishers have implemented ads.txt since then — representing a rise of 89.6% within 9 weeks (63 days).
Of the top 1,000 sites based on programmatic advertising volume (the “Pixalate Top 1,000”), 607 sites have implemented ads.txt — or 60.70%.
This represents an increase of five (5) new publishers since last week.
This number is up from 571 on January 1, representing a year-to-date rise of 6.30%.
Of the top 5,000 sites based on programmatic advertising volume (the “Pixalate Top 5,000”), 2,580 sites have implemented ads.txt — or 51.60%.
This indicates that an additional 31 sites within the Pixalate Top 5,000 implemented ads.txt in the past week.
This number is up from 2,355 on January 1, representing a year-to-date rise of 9.55%.
As of this writing, 270 Alexa Top 1,000 publishers have implemented ads.txt — or 27.00%.
This number is up from 220 on January 1, representing a year-to-date rise of 22.73%
Last week, Pixalate measured 272 Alexa Top 1,000 publishers as having implemented ads.txt. Publishers can move in and out of these top rankings.
As of this writing, 1,127 Alexa Top 5,000 publishers have implemented ads.txt — or 22.54%.
This represents an increase of eight (8) new publishers since last week.
This number is up from 1,013 on January 1, representing a year-to-date rise of 11.25%.
You can download the full list of publishers with ads.txt here:
Want more data-driven insights? Sign up for our blog!
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Thought Leadership
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”