Pixalate's 2019 App-ads.txt and Ads.txt Trends Report updates programmatic buyers and sellers on the latest trends around the IAB Tech Lab's initiatives.

Today, we're taking a look at the possible impact of app-ads.txt on invalid traffic (IVT).

Apps with app-ads.txt have 13% less IVT

According to Pixalate's data, apps with app-ads.txt have 13% less IVT compared to apps without the file, as of Q4 2019.

Here are the total IVT rates on apps with versus without app-ads.txt, broken down by quarter:

Q2 2019
- With app-ads.txt: 19.4%
- Without app-ads.txt: 30%
Q3 2019
- With app-ads.txt: 20.1%
- Without app-ads.txt: 32.7%
Q4 2019
- With app-ads.txt: 18.7%
- Without app-ads.txt: 21.1%

The difference in Q4 2019 equates to about 13% more IVT on apps without app-ads.txt compared to those that have adopted the initiative.

Pixalate's 2019 App-ads.txt & Ads.txt Report

Pixalate’s 2019 App-ads.txt and Ads.txt Trends Report includes:

Latest adoption trends for app-ads.txt and ads.txt
App-ads.txt adoption comparison for iOS vs. Android
Ad fraud (IVT) impact for both app-ads.txt and ads.txt
Adoption rates for the most popular apps & domains
Top SSPs for Android, iOS, and desktop (broken down as ‘reseller’ and ‘direct’)

Download a free copy of the 2019 App-ads.txt and Ads.txt Trends Report today.

Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.

Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”

Apps with app-ads.txt have 13% less IVT

Apps with app-ads.txt have 13% less IVT

Search Blog

Follow Pixalate

Subscribe to our blog

You May Also Like

Pixalate Releases Q3 2024 Global Invalid Traffic (IVT) & Ad Fraud Benchmarks: Ad Fraud & IVT Siphons $1.5 Billion in Mobile App Ad Spend and $1.4 Billion from CTV; Web Has Lowest IVT Rate (14%)

Pixalate Releases Q3 2024 North America Invalid Traffic (IVT) & Ad Fraud Benchmarks: United States Most At Risk to Ad Fraud on CTV (22% IVT Rate) & Mobile Apps (22%); Canada Has 17% Web IVT Rate

Pixalate Releases Q3 2024 LATAM Invalid Traffic (IVT) & Ad Fraud Benchmarks: Brazil Most At Risk to Ad Fraud on Mobile Apps (26% IVT Rate) and CTV (15%); Mexico has 12% IVT Rate for Web

Subscribe to our blog

Contact Us12

Download GSTI