This week's review of ad fraud and privacy in the digital advertising space:
Pixalate's November 2023 Children's Privacy Index for Mobile Advertising Sellers benchmarks Supply-Side Platforms (SSPs) based on the percentage of ads they sell that are on apps that are likely child-directed. Find out more in this blog and access the rankings below:
Pixalate's Trust & Safety Advisory Board published three new manual reviews this week where they assess an app’s child-directedness:
You can search Pixalate's full catalogue of reviews in our CTV and Mobile App Review Page
UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is contemplating imposing restrictions on social media access for teenagers under the age of 16 in order to safeguard them from online harm. Despite the introduction of the Online Safety Act, which mandates social media platforms to protect children from harmful content or face significant fines, the government is considering additional measures. Bloomberg reported that a consultation will be launched in the coming year to assess the risks faced by children while using social media. While some sources indicate that banning social media for those under 16 is being considered, a government spokesperson downplayed this possibility.
The Guardian covered the talks of banning in this press release
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Weekly Recaps
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”