Apple released iOS 16 on September 12th, and Pixalate examined consumer adoption rates of the new software three weeks in. More specifically, Pixalate examined programmatic ad sales on iOS devices from September 1 - 28, 2022 to estimate OS version adoption.
Key Takeaways:
(Note that the much anticipated – in the ad tech world, at least – SKAdNetworks 4.0 was not part of the iOS 16 release.)
Looking at the overall traffic distribution, perhaps unsurprisingly, the graph below shows that users on newer versions of iOS were more likely to upgrade to iOS 16. Most of the upgrades appear to have come from iOS 15.5/15.6 devices.
About 1-in-4 iOS 15.5+ users upgraded to the new OS, according to our data, while only 1-in-9 iOS 14 users upgraded.
Pixalate also observed some traffic from iOS 15.7 (released at the same time as iOS 16) devices, but the number appears to be relatively low, indicating that most users opted to go with the major upgrade
In the time period studied, Pixalate estimates that iOS 16 devices had an average ad fraud (IVT) rate of 14.8%, which was lower than all other versions (17.8% average).
According to our data, generally speaking, older OS versions also have a higher relative share of invalid traffic. For example, iOS 14 devices seem to generate 6.5% of the total IVT seen on iOS, even though they make up 5.5% of all iOS traffic.
Why are these findings relevant to the digital ad space? It’s an inside look at one of the data points we analyze for ad fraud detection.
We strive to ascertain what the expected traffic patterns should be because it helps us watch for discrepancies. If we see an unexpected spike in either iOS versions or IVT on various versions, it could be a sign of a new fraud attempt - and/or a new vulnerability that might be getting exploited - which prompts our fraud detection team to investigate further.
Additionally, insights on the OS versions across all devices is helpful for our clients in a variety of other (non-fraud related) use cases.
If you are interested in more insights like the above, across desktop, mobile and CTV devices, please reach out to us using this contact form.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on In the News
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”