Pixalate’s data science team analyzed 1.4 billion open programmatic ad transactions from March-May 2024 on traffic referred from 10+ social media platforms including TikTok, Twitter/X, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat, Reddit, LinkedIn, Pinterest, WeChat, and LINE to compile this global research; findings show 5% estimated IVT rate on Twitter/X in May 2024, down from 7% in March
LONDON, July 3, 2024 -- Pixalate, the global market-leading ad fraud protection, privacy, and compliance analytics platform, today released the May 2024 Global Social Media Invalid Traffic (IVT) Benchmarks Report. The report examines the estimated IVT rates across open programmatic advertising on social platforms for both web and mobile apps.
Pixalate's data science team analyzed 1.4 billion open programmatic ad transactions from March-May 2024 on traffic referred from 11 social media platforms to compile the research and reveal estimated trends in social media.
*Estimates based on IVT rate of social media referral traffic (e.g., traffic from Facebook, etc.)
For an in-depth analysis of IVT rates across popular social media platforms, download Pixalate's Global Social Media Invalid Traffic Benchmarks Report today:
About Pixalate
Pixalate is a global platform for privacy compliance, ad fraud prevention, and data intelligence in the digital ad supply chain. Founded in 2012, Pixalate’s platform is trusted by regulators, data researchers, advertisers, publishers, ad tech platforms, and financial analysts across the Connected TV (CTV), mobile app, and website ecosystems. Pixalate is MRC-accredited for the detection and filtration of Sophisticated Invalid Traffic (SIVT). www.pixalate.com
Disclaimer
The content of this press release, and the Social Media IVT Benchmarks, reflect Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that, opinions, which means that they are neither facts nor guarantees. Pixalate is sharing this data not to impugn the standing or reputation of any entity, person or app, but, instead, to report findings and trends pertaining to the time period studied.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Mobile Apps
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”