This week's review of ad fraud and privacy in the digital advertising space.
Pixalate's Trust & Safety Advisory Board regularly publish manual reviews where they assess an app’s child-directedness:
You can search Pixalate's full catalogue of reviews in our CTV and Mobile App Review Page.
Challenging industry assumptions. The Q3 2024 Programmatic Ad Seller Misrepresentation Report for Web was quoted by MediaPost this week in an article titled "Programmatic Posturing: Many Ad Sellers Are Unauthorized." Here's what the article had to say:
"Of all ad traffic containing the SupplyChain Object (SCO), 11% failed Pixalate's SCO verification in Q3 because of unauthorized sellers.
Moreover, '5% of all desktop and mobile web open programmatic ad impressions are sold by unauthorized ‘direct’ sellers,' he study states,
And, 94% of invalid traffic (IVT), including ad fraud, involved an unauthorized direct seller.
What all this means is that the digital advertising ecosystem is vulnerable to unauthorized selling despite ads.txt, the tool meant to enable buyers to check whether sellers are authorized by the publisher."
Visit MediaPost here to read the full article.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Weekly Recaps
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”