This week's review of ad fraud and quality in the digital advertising space.
Pixalate this week released a list of the top trending mobile apps in display advertising, featuring data from March 2018. Pixalate measured programmatic display advertising activity within mobile apps throughout March 2018 to compile the research. The "trending apps" are based on a share of voice analysis of programmatic ad volume across iOS and Android smartphones and tablets.
The full list of the top 30 trending apps is also available for download.
"Marketers taking a conservative approach to brand safety are pulling back from buying the long tail to minimize their exposure to fraudulent, non-viewable and brand-unsafe inventory," reported AdExchanger. The article notes that "[t]op publishers will benefit from the shift in brand dollars toward known, well-lit environments."
"On one hand, ads.txt ... helps publishers take control of their inventory by giving ad buyers a check against domain spoofing and arbitrage," wrote eMarketer. "On the other, making simple errors in the text file can lead publishers to miss out on some cash." The article cites recent research from FirstImpression which notes that about 16% of the top 30,000 Alexa publishers have errors in their ads.txt files. According to Pixalate's latest data, nearly 400,000 total sites now have ads.txt implemented.
Digiday calls "brand-safety officer" the "new most important role at agencies." The article notes that IPG Mediabrands tapped a new brand-safety officer this week, while GroupM filled a similar role last year. The article also notes that Bank of America "is in the process of hiring a brand-safety officer that will essentially focus on making sure the company gets what it pays for when it comes to advertising."
In an op-ed published on Forbes, Paul Roberts, founder and CEO of Kubient, writes: "In my opinion, the blockchain is not currently suited to analyze for fraud like machine learning, especially in the 100-millisecond, high QPS (Queries Per Second) environment of programmatic advertising lives."
Sign up for our blog to stay updated with new stats, trends, and analysis on digital ad fraud.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Weekly Recaps
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”