This week's review of ad fraud and quality in the digital advertising space.
A popular Google Chrome browser extension, Web Developer, was hit by an adware attack this week. The extension was hacked to insert advertisements on the user's browser. This is an example of adware, and Forbes wrote that "the Web Developer extension provided a massive audience for the hacker's shady ad campaign."
Citing a recent study from Comcast's FreeWheel, there are "ongoing issues over viewability and fraud" in the OTT space, wrote MediaPost. As Pixalate has noted, ad fraud is a major problem in the Connected TV/OTT space, and it's one that not many fully comprehend yet.
According to The Drum, citing an ANA survey, "the industry is working to improve the basic nature of the media transparency within the advertiser/agency relationship with more than 60% of agencies having indicated that their company had taken action steps to address the transparency issue." Transparency — and, subsequently, quality — have been major issues in the digital ad ecosystem for years, and this news indicates that they will continue to be hot topics for years to come.
P&G made waves last week when it announced that it cut over $100 million in digital ad spend last quarter over safety concerns and ineffective ads. And while P&G said the move was temporary, Marketing Week is asking if other brands will follow suit. "Marketers are likely to keep putting money into digital and particularly into Facebook and Google," wrote Marketing Week. "But that does not mean they shouldn’t re-evaluate how and where they put their money to weed out ineffective spend, as P&G has done."
Ad fraud remains a persistent problem for everyone in the ad industry," wrote Digiday. The publisher "talked to an ad buyer who had to clean up the mess left by scammers." After discovering the fraud, the buyer said their company "may re-examine the platforms we use that we bought the fraud through." To be proactive about the quality of ads sold in programmatic, be sure to check out Pixalate's free Seller Trust Indexes.
Sign up for our blog to stay updated with new stats, trends, and analysis on digital ad fraud.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Weekly Recaps
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”