This week's review of ad fraud and quality in the digital advertising space.
Pixalate was at DMEXCO this week, and we hosted a panel diving into quality within the mobile in-app programmatic supply chain with representatives from MoPub, Verizon Media, and Criteo.
A recording of the panel will be made available — sign up here to receive a link to the panel once the recording is available.
"Research released this week by fraud management company Pixalate shows Australia to have the third-highest rate of ad fraud globally, with nearly one of every three (30 per cent) programmatic ad impressions believed to be invalid," wrote B&T. "Only in India (39 per cent) and Colombia (35 per cent) is ad fraud more pervasive, while the US (19 per cent) and the UK (11 per cent) are significantly lower."
"A key finding within [a new IAB Europe] report is that whilst many of the challenges the industry has faced – particularly around ad fraud and brand safety – remain an ongoing concern, the buy-side has not yet adopted ads.txt and the mobile-specific apps-ads.txt in significant numbers," reported Mobile Marketing Magazine. "Only 6 per cent of advertisers and 26 per cent of agencies are buying the majority of their inventory ads.txt verified."
"In-app advertising is still struggling with issues that have largely been solved in other formats, such as ads that don’t render properly, fraud and measurement," reported Advertising Age. "Despite these flaws, however, advertisers continue to spend on in-app ads, because that’s where their targets are."
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Weekly Recaps
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”