Today, we’re announcing that, starting February 1, 2014, publishers can use our standard ad viewability and fraud detection services free of charge. As you’ve probably seen, we made these tools available to brands and agencies last month. This announcement is the next step in our mission to democratize ad analytics and bring increased transparency to the RTB ecosystem. With the help of these tools, publishers can now fill IO’s with specific viewability requirements, reduce fraud and garner higher CPMs.
Fraud Detection & Prevention - Pixalate’s technology detects and prevents both human and machine based fraud, and includes: fraud reporting and blocking, fraud graph, fraud analytics, and predictive fraud blocking.
Viewability - With Pixalate’s viewability tool, publishers can more precisely determine if an ad was viewed, how long it was viewed as well as many other data points related to the ad impression.
Heat Maps - FirePath user interaction heat maps show regions on pages where users spend time and provide recommendations on how best to redesign and optimize web sites.
Support - Publishers using DFP Premium/XFP (latest version), get free support.
To get started, go to pixalate.com and click on Request Your Demo.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Company News
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”