Our run through Q1 2017 programmatic ad fraud rates has zeroed in on mobile trends over the past week, and we’re continuing the in-depth mobile analysis today with a look at mobile ad fraud rates for some of the most common ad unit sizes both in-app and on the web across smartphones and tablets.
Our previous blog post noted that smartphone app ads are fraudulent more often than smartphone web ads, so it’s not surprising to see this trend ring true when looking at specific ad unit sizes as well.
However — in contrast to the above statement — our previous findings also noted that, overall, tablet app and web ads are fraudulent at roughly the same rate (12%). But when breaking it down by specific ad units, we see that common tablet app ad unit sizes are utilized most often by fraudsters.
This contrast highlights the nuanced differences between tablets and smartphones as two distinct devices in the mobile ecosystem
Video ad fraud rates are typically higher than display ad fraud rates on mobile devices in general, and this is readily apparent when we look at the individual ad units most commonly affected by ad fraud. Four of the most common mobile video app ad unit sizes (320x480, 480x320, and 300x250 for smartphones, and 320x480 for tablets) are fraudulent over one-third of the time.
Download the list of mobile app platforms with the best inventory quality in March.
This post is part of an ongoing series highlighting Pixalate's Quarterly Global Ad Fraud Benchmarks for Q1 2017. Sign up for our blog to learn more.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Mobile
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”