Pixalate’s research reveals 69% of MFA websites list Google AdExchange as an ad platform partner on ads.txt files, but only 5% of ad spend on MFA sites was sold by Google AdExchange; Magnite (18%), PubMatic (14%), and Index Exchange (8%) sold the most MFA ad spend (based on estimated ad spend) in March 2024
LONDON, April 12, 2024 -- Pixalate, the market-leading fraud protection, privacy, and compliance analytics platform for Connected TV (CTV) and Mobile Advertising, today released the Global March 2024 Rankings for Open Programmatic Ad Sellers on Made-For-Advertising (MFA) Websites.
The report includes rankings of open programmatic sellers, including supply-side platforms (SSPs), based on ads.txt analysis of MFA websites and estimated ad spend on MFA websites. The report also lists which sellers sold the least amount of ads on MFA websites in March 2024.
Pixalate’s data science team analyzed over 350 million programmatic ad impressions in March 2024 to compile this research. Estimated ad spend share of voice (SOV) is based on impression volume as measured by Pixalate.
Download the full report: March 2024 Rankings for Open Programmatic Ad Sellers on Made-For-Advertising (MFA):
Made for Advertising (MFA) is a term used to indicate websites or apps that are intentionally structured to maximize ad revenue for publishers. MFA websites offer a subpar user experience, bombarding visitors with distracting elements such as flashing ads and popups that obscure the content, resulting in a poor advertising-to-attention ration.
Pixalate bases its MFA designations on observed traffic from its global data pool. There are a number of characteristics that Pixalate checks for website MFA detection, including:
For more information on MFA, visit Pixalate’s MFA knowledge base.
About Pixalate
Pixalate is a global platform specializing in privacy compliance, ad fraud prevention, and digital ad supply chain data intelligence. Founded in 2012, Pixalate is trusted by regulators, data researchers, advertisers, publishers, ad tech platforms, and financial analysts across the Connected TV (CTV), mobile app, and website ecosystems. Pixalate is accredited by the MRC for the detection and filtration of Sophisticated Invalid Traffic (SIVT). pixalate.com
Disclaimer
The content of this press release, and the March 2024 Made-For-Advertising (MFA) Open Programmatic Sellers Risk Analysis Report, reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that, opinions, which means that they are neither facts nor guarantees.
Pixalate is sharing this data not to impugn the standing or reputation of any entity, person or app, but, instead, to report findings and trends pertaining to the time period studied.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Benchmarks
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”