Pixalate today released the Q2 2022 Delisted CTV Apps Report for a detailed look at Connected TV (CTV) apps delisted from the Roku and Amazon Fire TV app stores.
Download the full report - including the top 100 delisted CTV apps in Q2 2022 - for free here.
According to Pixalate’s data, 339 CTV apps were delisted over Q2 2022 across the Roku and Amazon Fire TV app stores. The majority of them, (296, or 87%), were delisted from the Roku Channel Store.
According to Pixalate's CTV device market share benchmarks, in June 2022, Roku accounted for 45% of CTV open programmatic ad spend* in North America, while Amazon accounted for 12% market share.
Disclaimer
Apps can be delisted for a variety of reasons, and Pixalate is neither asserting nor assigning a reason for any delisting action. Additionally, the initiator of the delisting is not generally publicly-available information, so it is often not possible to know whether the removal was triggered by the app store or the developer. Pixalate is sharing this data not to impugn the standing or reputation of any entity, person or app, but, instead, to report facts as they pertain to delisted Roku and Amazon Fire TV apps.
*Programmatic ad sales, as measured by Pixalate, are used as a proxy for ad spend.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on CTV
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”