Programmatic click fraud stretches across devices. Desktop, smartphone, and tablet devices are subject to click fraud — and all have seen their click fraud rates rise over the first half of 2017. Even Connected TV and OTT devices are not immune from programmatic click fraud.
But when breaking it down by two channels — display and video — what trends do we find?
Pixalate studied video ads sold via programmatic across devices and screens to begin 2017 and uncovered that click fraud is a growing problem.
Click fraud in programmatic video grew from a one-in-five problem to a one-in-four problem over the first several months of the year. However, click fraud in video has been declining when compared to its high of 42% in February. Pixalate will continue to track this trend.
Programmatic display click fraud increased over the first four months of 2017 as well.
Our research indicates that click fraud is a growing problem across devices and channels, including display and video ads. As marketers strive to apply programmatic technologies to high-quality trades, they must not get complacent when it comes to an issue that has plagued digital marketing from the beginning: click fraud.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Mobile
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”