Pixalate's recent Q1 2023 Age Screening Report for Mobile Apps examined how many of the top 1,000 most popular mobile apps in the Google Play and Apple App Stores screened for age in Q1 2023.
Pixalate’s Trust and Safety Advisory Board manually reviewed the apps to evaluate the following aspects of the registration flow:
(Popularity is based on downloads in the Google Play Store and reviews in the Apple App Store.)
The report covers a wide range of data points, so we thought it would be beneficial to highlight some of the most interesting findings.
Of analyzed apps that did not screen for age (Q1 2023):
Access Camera:
Access Microphone:
Access Location:
Access to Personal Information via Permissions:
Of analyzed child-directed apps that screen for age (Q1 2023):
Of analyzed apps that screen for age and allow children (Q1 2023):
Transmits Location in Ad Bid Stream:
Transmits IP in Ad Bid Stream:
Has Programmatic Ads:
For more analysis of Age Screening & Parental Consent On Mobile Apps, download a free copy of the report here:
If you are interested in more insights like the above, across desktop, mobile and CTV devices, please reach out to us using this contact form.
Disclaimer
The content of this blog, and the “Q1 2023 Children’s Online Privacy Risk Report: Age Screening & Parental Consent On Mobile Apps” (the "Report"), reflect Pixalate's opinions with respect to factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that, opinions, which means that they are neither facts nor guarantees. Pixalate is sharing this data not to impugn the standing or reputation of any entity, person or app, but, instead, to report findings and trends pertaining to privacy and information security practices and compliance across mobile apps in the time period studied.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Company News
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”