在中国,以华为(20%)、Vivo(19%)和Oppo(10%)为首的安卓系统以61%的媒体比重占有率(SOV)取代苹果iOS系统,成为中国最大的操作系统类型
伦敦,2024年22月May日——Pixalate作为一个针对于互联电视(CTV)和移动广告市场欺诈保护、隐私和合规分析的领先平台,今天发布了《2024年度亚太地区 (APAC) 第一季度移动设备市场份额报告》。
该报告,根据亚太地区的开放式程序化广告流量,对前沿(等)的移动设备进行了市场分析,并考察了中国移动设备的市场份额。Pixalate还发布了北美、欧洲、中东和非洲(EMEA)以及拉丁美洲(LATAM)版本的报告。
Pixalate的数据科学团队为编制本系列的研究报告,在2024年3月分析了超过1000万个移动应用(包括下架应用)和超过220亿个应用内的开放式程序化广告曝光。根据Pixalate的估量,媒体比重占有率 (SOV) 取决于每个地区与特定设备类型相关的已售出的开放式程序化广告的百分比。
关键调查结果 — 亚太地区:
关键调查结果 — 中国:
下载第一季度2024年按地区划分的移动设备份额报告
关于 Pixalate
Pixalate是一个专注于隐私合规、广告欺诈预防和数字广告供应链数据智能的全球平台。Pixalate成立于2012年,在互联电视(CTV)、移动应用和网站生态系统领域,深受监管机构、数据研究人员、广告商、出版商、广告技术平台和金融分析师的信赖。Pixalate通过MRC认证资质,用于检测和过滤复杂的无效流量(SIVT)。 pixalate.com
Disclaimer
The content of this press release, and the Mobile Device Market Share Reports, reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that, opinions, which means that they are neither facts nor guarantees.
Pixalate is sharing this data not to impugn the standing or reputation of any entity, person or app, but, instead, to report findings and trends pertaining to the time period studied.
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Mobile
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”