Pixalate’s research into open programmatic advertising finds that 594 Apple TV apps were subjected to “Proxy” as a form of invalid traffic (IVT) in Q2 2024, while “Proxy” IVT accounted for 26% of invalid traffic across Apple TV apps, as measured by Pixalate; On Samsung Smart TV apps, “Proxy” accounted for 50% of all IVT in Q2 2024, as measured by Pixalate
LONDON -- August 7, 2024 -- Pixalate, the market-leading fraud protection, privacy, and compliance analytics platform for Connected TV (CTV) and Mobile Advertising, today released the Top 10 Connected TV (CTV) Ad Fraud Types in Q2 2024 for Amazon Fire TV, Roku, Apple TV, and Samsung Smart TV.
The reports cover invalid traffic (IVT) and ad fraud measured across CTV app stores, including the number of distinct apps impacted and the share of voice of each IVT type. The reports also reveal the top 10 apps in each respective app store with the highest IVT rates in June 2024, according to Pixalate’s data.
To compile the research in this series, Pixalate’s data science team analyzed over 17.5 billion open programmatic advertising impressions and nearly 7k mapped CTV apps across Roku, Amazon Fire TV, Apple TV, and Samsung TV in Q2 2024. IVT types are rated ‘most common’ according to the share of invalid traffic within each CTV app store, as per Pixalate’s methodology.
For the purposes of this report, “Bundle ID (App) Spoofing'' indicates impressions in which the app identifier reported to the exchange does not match the characteristics of the app detected by Pixalate. “Proxy” is defined as impressions from an intermediary proxy device that exists to manipulate traffic counts, pass non-human or invalid traffic, or fails to comply with the protocol. For more information on IVT types, visit Pixalate’s IVT knowledge base.
Top CTV Ad Fraud Types by Platform: Download the reports today:
Pixalate is MRC-accredited for the detection and filtration of Sophisticated Invalid Traffic (SIVT) across desktop and mobile web, mobile in-app, and Connected TV (CTV). All of Pixalate’s MRC accredited measurement areas can be found here.
For more information on IVT types, visit Pixalate’s IVT knowledge base.
About Pixalate
Pixalate is a global platform specializing in privacy compliance, ad fraud prevention, and digital ad supply chain data intelligence. Founded in 2012, Pixalate is trusted by regulators, data researchers, advertisers, publishers, ad tech platforms, and financial analysts across the Connected TV (CTV), mobile app, and website ecosystems. Pixalate is accredited by the MRC for the detection and filtration of Sophisticated Invalid Traffic (SIVT). pixalate.com
Disclaimer
The content of this press release, and the CTV’s Most Common IVT Types Report, reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that, opinions, which means that they are neither facts nor guarantees. Pixalate is sharing this data not to impugn the standing or reputation of any entity, person or app, but, instead, to report findings and trends pertaining to the time period studied. Per the Media Rating Council (MRC), “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.” Where the traffic characteristics are suggestive of deliberate intent to mislead, such IVT is often referred to as “ad fraud.” Also per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes.”
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
These Stories on Ad Fraud
*By entering your email address and clicking Subscribe, you are agreeing to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: The content of this page reflects Pixalate’s opinions with respect to the factors that Pixalate believes can be useful to the digital media industry. Any proprietary data shared is grounded in Pixalate’s proprietary technology and analytics, which Pixalate is continuously evaluating and updating. Any references to outside sources should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that - opinion, not facts or guarantees.
Per the MRC, “'Fraud' is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”